About
Origin and Record
The history should be no larger than its evidence.
AI-drafted Documented position
Technotheology is a founder-directed religious and philosophical project, published as a website in 2026. Its texts were made with substantial AI involvement. It does not claim revelation, an inherited religious office, or authority conferred by a machine.
What is documented
The preserved source records show an initial publication, later editorial and visual reconstruction, and the v4 reconsideration. The historical reader contains the earlier texts, including positions the current edition rejects.
Website releases and document revisions are different records. Website
v1.0.0 and v2.0.0 are preserved. The editorial v3 material was published
within website v2; there was no separate v3 website release. The current
reconstruction is website v4.
The founder has announced a monthly gathering. This site does not supply verified attendance, accounts of completed gatherings, practice trials, community projects or testimonials. Proposed forms are not evidence that anyone has used them.
What is reported
The earlier founder’s note describes private questions accumulating over roughly three years before publication. It is retained as a dated statement from the founder. The underlying private notes were not available for this reconstruction, so that account is not presented as an independently established chronology.
The previous origin page expanded the account into scenes of evening writing and difficult meetings. Those details have been removed. A plausible scene does not become a fact by making an origin easier to imagine.
What history cannot supply
A dated archive can show what was said and changed. It cannot establish that a practice helps, that a room is safe, or that an argument is true. Those require different kinds of evidence.
The project remains under founder control. The public record makes that control inspectable; it does not make it independent.